Try Not to Laugh as Chuck Schumer Silkily Talks About ‘Fairness’ for the Upcoming Senate Impeachment Trial|Information as well as National politics

Attempt to suppress your giggling while viewing Democrat Minority Leader Chuck Schumer lecture individuals regarding the “justness” he intends to see in the Senate Impeachment test of President Trump. As a matter of fact, Schumer admits that some legislators think there’s so little evidence to convict Trump that he desires more “fairness” to suss out new dust that Residence Democrats didn’t find in their “questions.”

After your home carried out a lot of its “impeachment query” in Representative Adam Schiff’s panic area in key in the basement, after he denied Republicans an opportunity to call witnesses without Schiff’s authorization, you have actually got to value the out-of-the-ballpark gall that it requires to entirely disregard your very own side’s treachery as well as demand you be dealt with better.That was Schumer’s task on Monday as he informed press reporters that he intended to call his very own witnesses to indicate against Head of state Trump, access to subpoenaed files denied the House, as well as hold an actual trial to accumulate proof and cross examine witnesses.Put one more means, Schumer wants a do-over on Trump.CBS News reports that Schumer

desires the Trump White House ahead testify against the head of state: Schumer claims that” it is necessary that the American individuals court [the test] to be fair.” And also, naturally, he’s appropriate. However it would have implied something if he ‘d troubled to use

his influence with your home when it iced out almost all Republican input.Now that he’s seen the public reaction to how exceptionally insulting and weak the impeachment short articles are he’s attempting to reframe the debacle.Imagine Senators Kamala Harris, Mazie Horono, Diane Feinstein, Sheldon Whitehouse and also their various other Democratic colleagues bringing in “evidence “as well as cross-examining Schumer as well as Schiff’s cultivated witnesses. What a program. Think Kavanaugh 2.0. Christine Blasey Ford demonstrates the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hillside in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 27, 2018.( Saul Loeb/Pool Picture by means of AP ). No surprise Judiciary Committee Chairman, Lindsey Graham, says he will certainly call no witnesses and also will certainly depend upon the House Managers to plead their instances on the merits.Watch Schumer’s needs for yourself:

Crowd Taunts Philadelphia Police Officers, Laugh At Them In Midst Of Gunfire During Standoff In Nicetown-Tioga – CBS Philly

PHILADELPHIA (CBS)– While Philly law enforcement officer were managing a gunman who fired 6 of their own during a standoff at a house in the Nicetown-Tioga section, police officers likewise had to deal with being teased by some spectators. CBS3’s Alexandria Hoff reports a crowd of people laughed as well as chewed out police officers in the midst of gunfire throughout a standoff on Wednesday.

I stated this at 10 and also considering that I was bothered throughout that online shot, I’ll mention it below also. A major moment of frustration this night was viewing a group of individuals ridicule policeman, giggling and chewing out them in the middle of the shooting. #PhiladelphiaShooting

— Alexandria Hoff (@AlexandriaHoff) August 15, 2019

Police claim police officers were offering a narcotics necessitate on the 3700 block of North 15th Street around 4:30 p.m. when the suspect opened up fire. As police traded gunfire, policemans ran away via doors and windows.

6 policemans were shot and also transported to regional medical facilities. The police officers have since been released.

From 4:30 p.m. till 8 p.m., gunfire did not cease for greater than 40 mins each time. For some, the near consistent sound of shots felt like nothing more than a reality of where they live, and for others it restored memories of a war zone.

“It’s harmful, but this is the hood. This is what we live with daily,” one female stated.

“When they began discarding with the firepower as well as stuff like that, they did it before the daycare, the infants were out and every little thing, that’s crazy. I’m a discharged veteran. I assumed I remained in a DMZ zone. It’s setting off PTSD, all kinds of points, every one of this requires to be settled. It’s mindless, seriously purposeless,” one more female claimed.

Resources inform CBS3 that the scene was sheer mayhem as policemans were taking fire. Video clip from Chopper 3 revealed officers with weapons attracted at the scene.

Resources tell CBS3 the suspect was live-streaming several of the shootout while he blockaded himself inside the house.

The shooter stays armed inside the house.

CBS3’s Alexandria Hoff added to this record.

Trump’s Racist Attacks Inspire Silence From Republicans – Rolling Stone

It’s now been over 24 hours since President Trump told a group of congresswomen of color to “go back” to the “totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” GOP lawmakers are still silent.

As Republicans and their staffs continue to sort out the calculus of whether it’s politically expedient to issue some sort of statement distancing themselves from the president’s racism, Trump has doubled and tripled down on his attacks. “So sad to see the Democrats sticking up for people who speak so badly of our Country,” he wrote Sunday night, presumably, again, in reference to how Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) have criticized the conditions of border facilities housing migrants. “Such disgraceful behavior,” he added.

On Monday morning, he tweeted that the congresswomen should “apologize” for their “foul language” and their “horrible & disgusting actions.” A few minutes later, he called them racist.

If Democrats want to unite around the foul language & racist hatred spewed from the mouths and actions of these very unpopular & unrepresentative Congresswomen, it will be interesting to see how it plays out. I can tell you that they have made Israel feel abandoned by the U.S.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 15, 2019

On Sunday, Maggie Haberman of the New York Times suggested that Trump’s decision to keep running with the attacks was due in part to his party’s refusal to condemn them. “Subtext is no one in his party challenged him today so now he’s trying to make it a straight up/down referendum on this,” she wrote. Trump probably would have kept attacking the congresswomen anyway, but the GOP’s silence certainly isn’t helping. It also shows just how wholly the president’s white nationalism has subsumed the Republican Party. Trump’s values are their values, and Trump values an America that is white. This is no longer an issue of subtext.

It wasn’t that long ago that most Republicans would at least feign disgust whenever Trump would show his true colors.

During the 2016 campaign, when U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel presided over a fraud case involving Trump University, the president wrote that Curiel being “Mexican” presented a conflict of interest given Trump’s drive to construct a wall along the southern border (Curiel was born in Indiana). Several Republicans bashed the president’s allegation. Then-House Speaker Paul Ryan, lately a target of Trump’s Twitter attacks, called it “the textbook definition of a racist comment.”

Once Trump was elected, GOP objections to the president’s xenophobia were rarely so sharply worded. Instead, Republican lawmakers found the president’s comments “troubling,” their disappointment usually coming in the form of a boilerplate statement issued via tweet. The routine got old as it became clear they weren’t actually going to do anything about it. These ostensibly appalled Republicans still voted along with the president’s agenda and supported him when it mattered. If they didn’t, they subjected themselves to an attack from the president, presumably costing them the support of his base.

Coming up on two-and-a-half years into Trump’s presidency, Republicans have shed all pretense of caring that the leader of the free world is a virulent racist. Those who once made paltry efforts to keep Trump’s white nationalism at arm’s length have now embraced it as the public-facing identity of the GOP. The only substantial criticism of Trump’s racist tirade on Sunday came from Rep. Justin Amash, who announced earlier this month that he was leaving the party.

To tell these American citizens (most of whom were born here) to “go back” to the “crime infested places from which they came” is racist and disgusting.

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) July 14, 2019

The only other conservative lawmaker to chime in has been Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), who was only able to manage that it was “wrong” for the president to tell American-born congresswomen who have brown skin to go back to their countries “from which they came.” It was a pathetically hedged criticism — the first word of the next sentence of Roy’s tweet was “but” — but at least it was a criticism.

POTUS was wrong to say any American citizen, whether in Congress or not, has any ‘home’ besides the U.S. But I just as strongly believe non-citizens who abuse our immigration laws should be sent home immediately, & Reps who refuse to defend America should be sent home 11/2020.

— Chip Roy (@chiproytx) July 15, 2019

Everyone else has stayed silent. They know that, politically, they stand to lose more than they stand to gain by bucking the president. They blame Democrats, but no longer dare to criticize Trump for his word and actions, no matter how vile. The most craven and shameless among them have even taken to parroting the president’s language regarding people of color. Speaking of the conditions of the facilities in which migrants are being detained at the border, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said on Sunday that he doesn’t “care if they have to stay in these facilities for 400 days.” A day later, he called the attack on the congresswomen by Trump “anti-America” in part of an extended screed that Trump quoted fawningly (adding a “Need I say more?”) in yet another string of tweets.

Just like Paul Ryan, Graham was a harsh critic of Trump during the 2016 campaign, calling him “completely unhinged,” among other similar attacks. Graham might now be the president’s most loyal sycophant in the Senate, a chamber filled former Trump opponents who as of Monday morning are too scared to criticize one of the most garishly un-American sentiments a president has ever expressed. That is to say, the ones who don’t agree with it.

As Rep. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Monday morning, their silence is tantamount to an endorsement.

Until Republican officials denounce yesterday’s explicitly racist statements (which should be easy!), we sadly have no choice but to assume they condone it.

It is extremely disturbing that the *entire* GOP caucus is silent. Is this their agenda?

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 15, 2019

If this isn’t the Republicans’ agenda, some of them might want to go ahead and make that clear publicly.

UPDATE: During an interview with CNN on Monday morning, Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX), who in the past has criticized the president’s approach to immigration, called Trump’s tweets “racist and xenophobic.”

“It’s behavior that’s unbecoming of the president of the United States,” Hurd added. “We should be talking about uniting people, not dividing us, and ultimately politically it’s hurtful.”